NON LO DICO IO. LO HA DETTO LA CORTE COSTITUZIONALE
Si dirà che non era colpa sua , che il
PARTITO DEMOCRATICO
dello sciagurato quinDUCEnnio
aveva prodotto dei bilanci fasulli, ma tant'è.
Si potrà anche dire che il disastro fu causato da Dirigenti strapagati e premiati nonostante i danni arrecati, che il SEGRETARIO GENERALE dell' era dei GATTOPARDI non seppe consigliarlo, ma tant'è.
La "pezza " con la quale provò ad attappare il buco fu peggio del buco stesso. La sentenza 18/2019 della SUPREMA CORTE è caduta come una mannaia sul Comune di Frascati bocciando l' art. 1, comma 714 della legge 208/2015 ( chi c'era al Governo ..... quilli bravi ? ) " in virtù della quale le amministrazioni in rosso hanno potuto allungare i piani di riequilibrio finanziario scaricando gran parte del relativo onere sulle generazioni future. "
E che l' Amministrazione tuscolana fosse in rosso è cosa ovvia che risale al secondo mandato POSA ..... minimo. Un rosso tenuto a bada lasciando appostate in bilancio somme non più esigibili o, come disse l' ex Sindaco Spalletta " un assetto di bilancio fittiziamente virtuoso per sbandierare alla cittadinanza strategie non sostenibili, non sostenibili "
Scusate, ma se l' ex Sindaco Spalletta lo aveva capito e detto il 30 maggio 2015, io mi chiedo quale sia stata la responsabilità dei DIRIGENTI, del SEGRETARIO GENERALE e di CONSIGLIERI COMUNALI che approvarono quel bilancio 2014 e le " pezze " successive.
COSA ACCADRA' ORA ?
Buonsenso vorrebbe che a pagare quel 1.360.000 € dal 20120 al 2042 fossero chiamati i responsabili che ripeto :
SINDACI PRO TEMPORE, SEGRETARIO GENERALE, DIRETTORE GENERALE, ASSESSORI PRO TEMPORE, CONSIGLIERI COMUNALI che votarono i bilanci dal 2005 al 2014, DIRIGENTI e tutti coloro che che a questa ecatombe e alla successiva " pezza " incostituzionale presero parte.
Ma il vero problema è un altro e consiste in una cittadinanza ignorante dei problemi che non può neppure far conto su una OPPOSIZIONE
capace di coordinarla e farla scendere in piazza. D'altronde ...... quanto ad amministrare arrivano dei parvenu che di numeri non ne capiscono quale è l' ultima speranza ?
INCOSTITUZIONALITA' AL SUONO DEL BOLERO
https://www.facebook.com/592015390956949/videos/364945514352828/
GLI ATTI D'ACCUSA
INCOSTITUZIONALITA' AL SUONO DEL BOLERO
https://www.facebook.com/592015390956949/videos/364945514352828/
GLI ATTI D'ACCUSA
FRASCATI - Ancora VIRALI SUL BILANCIO che piacciono ai velletrani
FRASCATI - Così si è arrivati al fallimento dei GATTOPARDI
PARLA IL SINDACO : Gestione allegra e scheletri nell' armadio. ECCO COSA è STATA L'EPOPEA DEI GATTOPARDI
LAVORI IN CORSO ........ DAJEEEEEE !!!
ATTELLAPS : " FULMINATO QUANDO HO TOCCATO L' STS
https://www.facebook.com/592015390956949/videos/798776470280839/
THE "PATCH " OF THE MAYOR SHOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
I DO NOT TELL IT. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT HAS SAID IT
It will be said that it was not his fault, that the
DEMOCRATIC PARTY
of the unfortunate quinDUCEnnio
he had produced fake budgets, but so is it.
We can also say that the disaster was caused by MANAGERS overpaid and rewarded despite the damage caused, that the GENERAL SECRETARY of the era of the GATTOPARDI was not able to recommend it, but so be it.
The "patch" with which he tried to jam the hole was worse than the hole itself. The judgment 18/2019 of the SUPREMA CORTE has fallen like a cleaver on the Municipality of Frascati, taking the art. 1, paragraph 714 of the law 208/2015 (who was there to the Government ..... quilli bravi ?) "Under which the administrations in red have been able to extend the plans for financial rebalancing by downloading a large part of the relative burden on the generations future. "
And that the Tuscolana administration was in red is obvious that dates back to the second mandate POSA ..... minimum. A red held at bay leaving budget items no longer payable or, as the Mayor Spalletta said, "a fictitiously virtuous budget structure to flaunt unsustainable, unsustainable strategies to the citizens"
Sorry, but if the Mayor Spalletta had understood and said on May 30, 2015, I wonder what was the responsibility of the MANAGERS, the SECRETARY GENERAL and MUNICIPAL COUNCILORS who approved that 2014 budget and the "patches" later.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN NOW ?
Common sense would want that to pay these € 1,360,000 from 20120 to 2042 were called those responsible that I repeat are:
MAYORS PRO TEMPORE, SECRETARY GENERAL, GENERAL DIRECTOR, PRO TEMPORE ASSESSORS, MUNICIPAL COUNCILORS who voted the budgets from 2005 to 2014, DIRECTORS and all those who took part in this massacre and the subsequent unconstitutional "patch".
But the real problem is another and consists of an ignorant citizenship of problems that can not even be counted on an OPPOSITION able to coordinate it and make it go down to the streets. On the other hand ... when arrive administrators parvenu, who do not understand the numbers , which is the last hope?
THE "PATCH " OF THE MAYOR SHOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
I DO NOT TELL IT. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT HAS SAID IT
It will be said that it was not his fault, that the
DEMOCRATIC PARTY
of the unfortunate quinDUCEnnio
he had produced fake budgets, but so is it.
We can also say that the disaster was caused by MANAGERS overpaid and rewarded despite the damage caused, that the GENERAL SECRETARY of the era of the GATTOPARDI was not able to recommend it, but so be it.
The "patch" with which he tried to jam the hole was worse than the hole itself. The judgment 18/2019 of the SUPREMA CORTE has fallen like a cleaver on the Municipality of Frascati, taking the art. 1, paragraph 714 of the law 208/2015 (who was there to the Government ..... quilli bravi ?) "Under which the administrations in red have been able to extend the plans for financial rebalancing by downloading a large part of the relative burden on the generations future. "
And that the Tuscolana administration was in red is obvious that dates back to the second mandate POSA ..... minimum. A red held at bay leaving budget items no longer payable or, as the Mayor Spalletta said, "a fictitiously virtuous budget structure to flaunt unsustainable, unsustainable strategies to the citizens"
Sorry, but if the Mayor Spalletta had understood and said on May 30, 2015, I wonder what was the responsibility of the MANAGERS, the SECRETARY GENERAL and MUNICIPAL COUNCILORS who approved that 2014 budget and the "patches" later.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN NOW ?
Common sense would want that to pay these € 1,360,000 from 20120 to 2042 were called those responsible that I repeat are:
MAYORS PRO TEMPORE, SECRETARY GENERAL, GENERAL DIRECTOR, PRO TEMPORE ASSESSORS, MUNICIPAL COUNCILORS who voted the budgets from 2005 to 2014, DIRECTORS and all those who took part in this massacre and the subsequent unconstitutional "patch".
But the real problem is another and consists of an ignorant citizenship of problems that can not even be counted on an OPPOSITION able to coordinate it and make it go down to the streets. On the other hand ... when arrive administrators parvenu, who do not understand the numbers , which is the last hope?
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento